IBLAM College of Law

Keywords: law enforcement, mining, illegal

Abstract

Mining management in Indonesia which is currently given the authority to be delegated to each region that has the potential for natural resources, as stated in CHAPTER VI of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia after the amendment of Regional Government. Article 18 paragraph (5) states that “Regional governments exercise the widest possible autonomy, except for government affairs which are determined by law as affairs of the Central Government”. With the results of the study that mining activities without a permit (illegal coal mining) is a criminal act that requires law enforcement efforts against it. The control carried out by Distamben on coal mining without a permit is first through a partnership pattern, secondly, the control with the Satpol PP, and finally the control involves the Samarinda City Police.

References

• Adami Chazawi (2007). Pelajaran Hukum Pidana Bagian I. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo
• Ahmad Zahedi Fikry (2006). Penegakan Hukum Atas Pertambangan Tanpa Izin (PETI) Batubara di Kalimantan Selatan. https://kaltim.tribunnews.com/2021/09/10/adanya-dugaan-aktivitas-tambangbatu-bara-ilegal-warga-samarinda-utara-geram pada 31 Mei 2022 https://kaltimprov.go.id/opd/dinas-energi-dan-sumber-daya-mineral pada 31 Mei 2022
• H Salim. H.S (2004). Hukum Pertambangan di Indonesia. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada. http://koperindag.karokab.go.id/index.php/5-pertambangan-tanpa-izin-petidankarakteristiknya. Diakses Tanggal, 31 Mei 2020, Pukul 11:44 WIB
• Miriam Budiardjo (1978). Dasar-dasar Ilmu Politik. Jakarta: PT.Ikrar Mandiri Abadi.
• Undang-Undang Nomor 3 Tahun 2020 tentang Perubahan Atas UndangUndang Nomor 4 Tahun 2009 Tentang Pertambangan Mineral Dan Batubara
• Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945
• Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 6 Tahun 2010 tentang Satuan Polisi Pamong Praja.
• Pramudi Atmosudirjo (1994). Hukum Administrasi Negara. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.
• Soerjono Soekanto (1996). Suatu Pengantar Sosiologi. Bandung: Rajawali Press.
• Soerjono & Soekanto (2010). Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta : UI Press.
• Freudenthal, H. (1991). Revising Mathematics Education. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
• Madya, S. (2011). Teori dan Praktik Penelitian Tindakan (Action Research). Bandung: Alfabeta.

Pdf : https://journal.elena.co.id/index.php/humaniorum/article/view/1/4

Published

2023-01-15

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 01 (2023): Humaniorum Journal

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Darmin Sumanggi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

The post Law Enforcement Against Illegal Coal Mining in the Samarinda Region, East Kalimantan first appeared on IBLAM School Of Law.

Keywords: e-money, laws, bank syariah mandiri

Abstract

Prospective BSM E-Money card users will not be required to register (unregistered system), which means they do not need to fill in their identity at Bank Syariah Mandiri. However, there are things that need to be considered by prospective BSM E-Money card users, namely that Bank Syariah Mandiri will not replace the balance used by irresponsible parties if the card chip is lost. This is because, in use, starter packs do not require a PIN or signature anymore. So, of course, the law needs to step in to protect electronic money users from risks that may result in major losses for electronic money users. As consumers, electronic money users can refer to legal protection in Article 1 Paragraph 2 of Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection. The method used for writing this journal is a normative legal method using a qualitative approach. Given that there is no guarantee from the Deposit Insurance Agency (LPS), at least electronic card users are given equal rights and fairness, like a good relationship between ordinary bank customers and issuing banks, especially Bank Syariah Mandiri. Bank Syariah Mandiri is expected to be able to offer agreements in the use of electronic money payment instruments so that electronic money users can know their rights and obligations toward Bank Syariah Mandiri as business actors.

References

• Abdulkadir Muhammad, (2004) Hukum dan Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta : PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.
• Ashofa, Burhan (2004). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta : Rineka Cipta.
• Kristiyani, C. T. S., (2011) Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
• Idroes, Ferry (2008) Manajement Resiko Perbankan. Bandung : Rajawali Pers.
• Junita, Fify (2005) Aspek Risiko Dan Tanggung Gugat Bank Dalam Transaksi Pengiriman Uang Secara Elektronik. Surabaya : Yuridika.
• Pieris, J. & Widiarty, W. S. (2007) Negara Hukum dan Perlindungan Konsumen Terhadap Produk Pangan Kedaluwarsa. Jakarta : Pelangi Cendikia.
• Ibrahim, Johnny (2006) Teori dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Malang: Bayumedia.
• Komarudin (1979) Metode Penulisan Skripsi dan Tesis. Bandung :Remaja Rosdakarya.
• Marzuki, P. M. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana.
• Purnomo, S. D. et al, (2012) Untung Dengan Kartu Kredit, Kartu ATM-Debit, & Uang Elektronik. Jakarta: Visimedia.
• Hidayati, S. et al, Operasional E-Money, Jakarta: BI.
• Soekanto, S. & Mamudji, Sri (1995) Penelitian Hukum Normatif (Suatu Tinjauan Singkat). Bandung : Rajawali Pers.
• Soekanto, S. (2014) Pengantar Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: UI-Perss.
• Dunil,Z. (2014) Kamus Istilah Perbankan Indonesia, Jakarta : PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
• Bank Indonesia, (2006) Paper Seminar Internasional Toward a Less Cash Society in Indonesia. Jakarta: Direktorat Akunting dan Sistem Pembayaran Bank Indonesia.
• Abdullah, B. (2006) Paper Seminar Internasional Toward a Less Cash Society in Indonesia. Jakarta: Direktorat Akunting dan Sistim Pembayaran Bank Indonesia.
• Tobing, D. L. (2006) OJK Selaku Pelindung Konsumen dan Pelaku Usaha, Paper Seminar.
• Penegakan Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen Pasca Undang-Undang Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK) Nomor 1 Tahun 2013”, Jakarta, Otoritas Jasa Keuangan,
• Tim Inisiatif (2006) Working Paper: Upaya Meningkatkan Penggunaan Alat Pembayaran Non Tunai Melalui Pengembangan E-Money. Jakarta: BI.
• Undang Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen
• Undang-Undang Nomor 10 Tahun 1998 Tentang Perubahan Atas Uu No. 7 Tahun 1992 Tentang Perbankan.
• Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2004 tentang Lembaga Penjamin Simpanan
• Undang-undang Nomor 3 Tahun 2004 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 1999 tentang Bank Indonesia
• Undang-Undang Nomor 21 Tahun 2011 tentang Otoritas Jasa Keuangan
• Freudenthal, H. (1991). Revising Mathematics Education. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
• Madya, S. (2011). Teori dan Praktik Penelitian Tindakan (Action Research). Bandung: Alfabeta.

Pdf ; https://journal.elena.co.id/index.php/humaniorum/article/view/3/1

Published

2023-01-15

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 01 (2023): Humaniorum Journal

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Aulia Passya Fauzi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

The post Analysis of Law no. 8 of 1999 As Legal Protection for Consumers Using Electronic Money (E-Money) at Bank Syariah Mandiri first appeared on IBLAM School Of Law.

IBLAM College of Law

Keywords: system of proof, burden of proof, terrorism

Abstract

As a lex specialis, Law Number 15 of 2003 has formal specificity compared to the Criminal Procedure Code. One of these specificities that is the focus of this writing is related to the use of evidence which is a renewal of the conventional proof process in the Criminal Procedure Code. The arrangement regarding evidence in Law Number 15 of 2003 can be seen in Article 27. How is the system of proof, burden of proof, evidence in Law Number 15 of 2003 concerning Criminal Acts of Terrorism? The type of research used is normative juridical. The results of the study show that in the process of proving there are three main things, namely the system of proof, the burden of proof, and evidence. In the settlement process for criminal acts of terrorism, evidence is closely related to Human Rights (HAM). To prove whether a person is involved or not in a criminal act of terrorism, the evidentiary process plays a very important role, considering that many punishments in Law Number 15 of 2003 are in the form of life sentences or death sentences which are actually contrary to human rights. The crime of terrorism is included in the type of extraordinary crime. In terms of proof, the burden of proof is the ordinary burden of proof according to Law Number 15 of 2003

References

• Andi Hamzah (2005). Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
• Andi Hamzah (1985). Pengantar Hukum Acara Pidana di Indonesia. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.
• (Angga Bastian dkk,2006). Makalah Sistem Pembuktian dan Beban Pembuktian Pada Matakuliah Hukum Pembuktian, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, Depok, 2006,
• (Bambang Poernomo,1998). Pokok-pokok Tata Cara Peradilan Indonesia, Liberty,Jogjakarta, 1998, Hal.39
• Bom Bali Rencananya untuk Peringati Setahun Bom WTC”, <http://www.kompas.com/kompascetak/0308/22/nasional/505322.htm>, diakses 7 Februari 2009.
• (Djoko Prakoso, 1988). Alat Bukti dan Kekuatan Pembuktian di dalam Proses Pidana (Yogyakarta: Liberty, 1988), hal. 37.
• (Edmon Makarim, 2003). Kompilasi Hukum Telematika, Rajagrafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2003, Hal. 417
• (Hamzah, 2005). Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta 2005, Hal. 250
• (HMA. Kuffal, 2005). Tata Cara Penggeledahan dan Penyitaan, UMM Press,Malang, 2005, Hal. 25-29
• (Luhut MP Pangaribuan, 2005). Hukum Acara Pidana: Surat-surat Resmi di Pengadilan oleh Advocat (Jakarta: Djambatan, 2005), hal. 3-4.
• (M.Yahya Harahap, 2006). Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2006, Hal. 276
• (M.Yahya Harahap, Yahya Harahap,2006). Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2006, Hal. 301
• (Muhammad Taufik Makarao dan Suhasril, 2004). Hukum Acara Pidana dalam teori dan praktek, Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta, 2004, Hal. 104
• (Subekti, 1995). Hukum Pembuktian, Pradnya Paramita, Jakarta, 1995, Hal. 1
• (T. Nasrullah,2004). Sepintas Tinjauan Yuridis Baik Aspek Hukum Materil Maupun Formil Terhadap Undang-undang No. 15/2003 Tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Terorisme, Makalah Pada Semiloka tentang “Keamanan Negara” yang diadakan oleh Indonesia Police Watch bersama Polda Metropolitan Jakarta Raya, Selasa 29 Maret 2004, hal. 3.
• (Terang, 1995). Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Acara Pidana, Titik Terang, 1995,Hal. 170
• Undang-undang Dasar 1945, Pembukaan Alinea ke-4.
• Undang-Undang Tentang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP), UU No. 8, LN. No. 76 Tahun 1981, TLN. 3209, Pasal 184. (b)
• Undang-undang tentang Komisi Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi, UU No. 30, LN No. 137 Tahun 2002, TLN. No. 4250, ps. 37A.
• Undang-undang Tentang Penetapan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2002 Tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Terorisme, Menjadi Undang-undang, UU No. 15, LN. No. 45 Tahun 2003, TLN. No. 4284, Penjelasan umum Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2002 Tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Terorisme paragraf dua.(a)
• Undang-undang Tentang Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang, UU No. 15, LN. No. 30 Tahun 2002, TLN No., ps. 35.
• (Wirjono Prodjodikoro, 2005). dalam Andi Hamzah, 2005, Op.cit, Hal. 252
• (Yahya Harahap, 1988). Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP Jilid I dan II, Pustaka Kartini, Jakarta, 1988 dan 1993Hal. 797-798

Pdf : https://journal.elena.co.id/index.php/humaniorum/article/view/5/3

Published

2023-01-15

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 01 (2023): Humaniorum Journal

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Dika Pranata

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

The post Juridical Analysis of the Proof System, Burden of Evidence, Evidence in Law Number 15 of 2003 concerning Criminal Acts of Terrorism first appeared on IBLAM School Of Law.

Keywords: ASEAN, narcotics, children, ASEAN work plan

Abstract

Currently, drug abuse by children continues to be a public concern and never stops being discussed and publicized. Certain circles, such as ASEAN (the Association of Southeast Asian Nations), have always been committed to fighting the threat of drugs in the Southeast Asian region. The main vision of the region is to achieve a “drug-free ASEAN”. Referring to the vision and slogan, ASEAN formed an ASEAN Work Plan (ASEAN Work Plan) with one sector, namely rehabilitation. The purpose of this research and study in general is to find out and discuss the effectiveness of the rehabilitation program as a sector of the ASEAN work plan in dealing with children who abuse narcotics. The method used for writing this journal is a normative legal method using a quantitative and qualitative approach. In writing this journal, the authors also follow a research typology that is descriptive in nature. Based on the research results, it can be concluded that the rehabilitation program, as a sector of the ASEAN work plan, can be said to be somewhat successful in dealing with children who abuse narcotics. However, the data above is not enough to prove that the rehabilitation program is a sector of the ASEAN work plan. This is due to the absence of proportions and data showing the results of the rehabilitation program as a sector of the ASEAN work plan. Referring to the Indonesian Drug Reports, BNN stated in the Mid-Term Review of the ASEAN Work Plan that the proportion of success in the rehabilitation sector was 80%..

References

• Arieaf, Barda Nawawi. (1994) Beberapa Aspek Pengembangan Ilmu Hukum Pidana (Menyongsong Generasi Baru Hukum Pidana Indonesia). Semarang.
• Iksan, Muchamad. (2012) Hukum Perlindungan Saksi dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia. Surakarta: Fakultas Hukum.
• Widdy, Agustinus et al. (2019) Indonesia Drugs Report Tahun 2019. Jakarta : Pusat Penelitian, Data dan Informasi Badan Narkotika Nasional 2019.
• Widdy, Agustinus et al. (2020) Indonesia Drugs Report Tahun 2020. Jakarta : Pusat Penelitian, Data dan Informasi Badan Narkotika Nasional 2020.
• Putri, Widha Utami et al. (2021) Indonesia Drugs Report Tahun 2021. Jakarta : Pusat Penelitian, Data dan Informasi Badan Narkotika Nasional 2021.
• Putri, Widha Utami et al. (2022) Indonesia Drugs Report Tahun 2022. Jakarta : Pusat Penelitian, Data dan Informasi Badan Narkotika Nasional 2022.
• Sulistyorini, Dwi et al. (2020) Potret Efektivitas Rehabilitasi Penyalahguna Narkotika Di Lembaga Pemasyarakatan. Jakarta : Pusat Penelitian, Data dan Informasi Badan Narkotika Nasional.
• The ASEAN Secretariat, (2017). The ASEAN Work Plan on Securing Communities Against Illicit Drugs 2016-2025. Jakarta
• Asshiddiqie, Jimly (2009) Komentar Atas Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia tahun 1945. Jakarta:Sinar Grafika.

Pdf : https://journal.elena.co.id/index.php/humaniorum/article/view/7/5

Published

2023-01-15

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 01 (2023): Humaniorum Journal

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Ahmad Fajar Satrio

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

The post Study of The Effectiveness of The Rehabilitation Program as a Sector of the Asean Work Plan in Treating Children Abused Narcotics first appeared on IBLAM School Of Law.

Keywords: judge’s decision, crime, independent testimony

Abstract

According to data from the Central Statistical Agency (2021), although Indonesia’s crime rate has declined marginally over the past five years, this figure does not accurately reflect the strength of the country’s legal system. There are at least 247,218 cases in 2020 and 239,481 cases in 2021. The existence of a judge’s ruling is a crucial component of concluding a criminal case. Although witness testimony can be used as evidence in court, one sort of witness statement, known as “stand-alone testimony,” is currently being researched for its potential. With respect to the case’s comprehension, the author of this study will explore the problem’s subject utilizing a legal-justice research methodology (Soekanto, 1986). This study was also carried out using the approach of statutory regulations and applicable theories. Based on the results and discussion above, the authors draw the conclusion that there is an effect of the strength of evidence from independent testimony on criminal case decisions, but it is not significant. The judge cannot use testimony that stands alone as evidence because the testimony is counted as a single testimony, which does not meet the standard as a consideration in deciding a crime against the defendant.

References

• Salam, M. F. (2001) Hukum Acara Pidana Dalam Teori & Praktek. Bandung : Mandar Maju.
• Prinst, Darwan. (1998) Hukum Acara Pidana Dalam Praktik. Jakarta: Djambatan.
• Harahap, M. Y. (2000) Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
• Soekanto, S. (1986) Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: UI-Press.
• Mulyadi, Lilik. (2007) Putusan Hakim dalam Hukum Acara Pidana. Bandung : Citra Aditya Bakti Bandung.
• Marpaung, L. (1995) Proses Penanganan Perkara Pidana Bagian Kedua. Jakarta : Sinar Grafika.
• Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Acara Pidana, Pasal 200.
• BPS (2021). Jumlah Tindak Pidana Menurut Kepolisian Daerah 2019-2021. Jakarta : Badan Pusat Statistik.

Pdf : https://journal.elena.co.id/index.php/humaniorum/article/view/6/2

Published

2023-01-15

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 01 (2023): Humaniorum Journal

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Dimas Farhann Danu Pratama

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

The post The Impact of the Power of Proof of Stand-alone Testimony Against Decisions on Criminal Cases first appeared on IBLAM School Of Law.